Benetan beheko lerroa hau:
Life denbora Elikagaiak, iraupena konpromisoa, and obligation to support child not biologically yours is a really really REALLY stupid shitty deals.
Jendeak behartutako bizitza denbora Elikagaiak ordaindu behar, jendeak, ondo, bere errua da, they chose that deal.
Nire osoa da ezkontza termino batzuk dela, beraz, inoiz ez du egiten consensually pertsonen kopurua esanguratsua da. Dezagun aurpegia duten. Nahi duten haur-laguntza ordaindu behar seme-alabek ez da hori bere egiteko ados? You got bat neska-lagun nahi duzun bizi bada,, begiratu eta esan, Sexu zurekin ados nago, baina I got amaitu gero beste batzuk Guy ordaindu beharko duzu. Litzateke kontratua sinatu duzu?
Imagine if government is not in marriage business. Who would stipulate that kind of terms in his cohabitation contract? Seriously.
The thing almost nobody would make such shitty deals.
They do so because:
1. Alternative deals are taxed differently, illegal, or legally impossible. Those are sugar relationship, prostitution, contract temporary marriage, etc. Izan ere,, the more similar the relationship is to marriage, the more illegal it is. Look at polygamy, adibidez. The farther away a relationship from marriage, the more it’s acceptable. Free sex and celibacy is legal because it doesn’t compete with marriage anyway.
2. The deal is not explicit. It’s one of those hidden contract deep inside the contract. It’s like McDonald saying that by eating in this restaurant you agree to be a life time slave and the deal is somewhere deep inside hundreds of page of “service agreement”. Normally, FTC, would crack down on this type of shit being unconscionable and not prominently displayed. Life time alimony deals is like that shady hidden terms.
3. They never make that deals. If government does not manage marriage, people would have to craft their own marriage contract. There is no way anyone would draft life time alimony deals when they draft their own contract. Women would simply ask for more money, and men would simply stipulate that the kid must be his. It’s win win for both side. Now such explicit cohabitation agreement is rare because of government heavy endorsement.
Government put a shit load of trick to trap people into marriage. That must go away.
is a post from: Free Market Forever
Harkorra bilaketa-terminoak:
- powered by phpBB israel culture (24)
- powered by phpBB christian drug rehab (22)
- powered by phpBB christian drug rehabilitation center (19)
- powered by phpBB basic marketing definitions terms (14)
- powered by phpBB canadian people finder (11)
- powered by phpBB children las vegas entertainment (10)
- powered by phpBB las vegas free entertainment (10)
- powered by phpBB lesson plans (10)